Nathan Shoultz
Sign in
Enter your member name and password to sign in to your Word of Life account.

Incorrect username or password provided!
username

password

WOL Insider Benefits
This section is not yet available to the public, but will be very soon!
Register new account
email

password(min. 6 characters)

confirm password

Nathan Shoultz's Blog Header
RSS Facebook Twitter LinkedIn
If you would like to give toward the Nathan Shoultz Family please click the Donate button. Nathan’s home church is handling all gifts and donations.  This will redirect you to the Mountainside Bible Chapel PayPal site.
Short Term Missions: Isn't it Pointless?
June 29, 2010 ~ 14 comments

I have a good friend in youth ministry who would say, "Why take students to another country to tell people about Christ when those same students don't even tell people about Christ in their own school."  I know another person who would say, "Why take students on a mission trip if we can only be there 2 weeks.  How will we see any lasting fruit?"  Both of these guys (for different reasons) would say Short Term Missions is pointless.  I wholeheartedly disagree.

Part of the reason is I'm biased.  I admit it. In 1996, I went on a short term trip with Youth Reachout to Peru that changed my life.  It's a huge part of why I'm in ministry today. But part of the reason is philosophical.  I think there are two huge reasons why Short Term Missions is an absolute MUST in student ministry today.

reachout

Reason One:

It's more about the change in the students than the change in the country.

My friend whose biggest gripe is that two weeks is not enough time to change a country is missing the point.  First, even if only one life was changed because of the trip, if only one person were saved.... wouldn't that make it worth it? You might say no because you could invest your time somewhere else and see more reward. But God's economy doesn't work that way.  If you ask the person whose life was changed, I bet they'd say it was worth it.

Second, the biggest change that happens on a short term trip is not in the country anyway.  It's in the students and leaders who go on the trip.  Like I said, my trip was monumental in me answering the call to ministry. So now, multiply the lives changed on that trip in 1996 by all the students who went on the trip who are now ministering to hundreds of students themselves.  It's mind blowing. Many of those are now in other countries and have their entire lifetime to minister in other countries.  That may never have happened if we had not gone on that short term trip.

Reason Two:

It's about getting out of your comfort zone because that's when God stuff happens.

I think we'd all agree, the time when God most impacts our lives seems to be when we're way out on a limb somewhere.  Rarely is it when we're nice and comfy in our pj's on the couch watching re-runs of LOST. We've probably all used the illustration that it takes a lot of pressure to change coal into a diamond.  God uses pressure, stress, and other out-of-our-comfort-zone means to mold us into who he wants.  Nothing gets a middle class American kid out of his comfort zone like walking though the sewage filled streets of a mountain town in Peru, seeing utter poverty and desperation on the faces of men, women, and children! That's when the God stuff happens!

So, if you've been thinking of a missions trip but are struggling with whether or not it’s worth it, let me encourage you: IT IS!  We've even got some great resources at Word of Life to help you.  Check out Reachout

Bookmark and Share
14 comments
Author: Caleb - June 30, 2010
RIGHT ON. couldnt agree more! I am who I am today in Christ because of short term missions trips.
Author: Paul Sheneman - June 30, 2010
To the best of my knowledge, this is the first time that I have posted on your blog. I am sorry that it is going to be negative. But I hope that it sparks some needed conversation on short-term missions (STM) in youth ministry.

I have read your two supporting points for short-term missions and I wonder, "Do you think that they are sufficient, Christian reasons?"

Concerning Reason 1: Though I agree in principle that leaving the 99 in order to save the 1 is a Christian paradigm, I don't think this reason takes into account the complexity of STM. For instance, the phraseology of STM suggests that it is in a field of activity that is supposed to be focused on the host. In other words, missions is about the other. Now, several have suggested that we may need to change the language of STM to pilgrimage in order to develop it into a vital Christian practice. What do you think?

Concerning Reason 2: Your example gives a head nod toward what some have termed "voyeurism of the poor." If getting students "out of their comfort zone" entails parading them in front of the poor in order to shock an experience into them then we might want to rethink our theology.

Below are two great papers. The first is a qualitative assessment of STM which leads to a proposal to phrase the activity as Pilgrimage. The second is a constructive paper that outlines a Christian moral discourse on travel practices.

"Short-Term Missions as Pilgrimage" by David Wesley: http://didache.nts.edu/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&gid=790&Itemid=

Adeney, Miriam. 2006. Shalom tourist: Loving your neighbor while using her. Missiology 34
(4): 463-476.

Let me know what you think.
Blessings to you.
Author: Nathan Shoultz - June 30, 2010
@Paul

Thanks for the comments Paul. I appreciate your perspective. I think a little debate is healthful so long as it's done in a spirit of love. I think you've done that here. However, I must say, I still disagree with you.

Concerning your rebuttal of reason 1: I think you might still be missing my point. The point is, though 2 weeks may not be enough time to see lasting change in a country, it is long enough to see lasting change in a student.... AND, that student may very well go back and spend his lifetime in that country (or another one). I think the point of short term missions is to open the eyes of students and challenge them to answer the call.

Concerning your rebuttal of Reason 2: I'm not suggesting we parade anyone anywhere. Perhaps I should have been more descriptive of what I consider short term missions. I was making an unwise assumption that everyone does it the way we do.  I am not saying we pack kids on a tour bus, run them through a town and let them take pictures and ooh and aah. That would be voyeurism. The trips I've been on have involved walking through those streets, engaging people in conversation, sharing the Word with them, perhaps giving them the Word. I don't see how delivering the Word to anyone could be seen as wrong. After all,its the Word.... the only thing with the power to change lives. And, what I'm saying is: How would an American kid ever even know there was a third world? In America we are FAR too focused on ourselves. The act of forcing ourselves to look and see and have compassion IS a Biblical concept (reference John 4:35)

So Paul, thank you very much for your thoughtful replies. However, my perspective remains unchanged. I do agree though, I should have been more clear with my words. I should have said Short Term Missions DONE RIGHT, because there are many churches and groups doing it wrong. They may even be doing more harm than help. Perhaps that's material for a future post: Short Term Missions Done Right. I'll take a look at your papers.
Author: Ray - June 30, 2010
WOW! Nathan! You are so right. Especially the part about it's more about change in students than in the country. I can testify that was exactly what happened in my own son's life. Great insight.
Author: Paul Sheneman - June 30, 2010
@Nathan Thanks for the thoughtful reply. You clarified a lot of the questions I had about your original post. I realized as I was reading your reply that I had not clarified my position. I do think that STM is a valuable practice but several factors need to be taken into account for it to be sufficiently Christian in its expression. So I was not trying to change your position on STM rather I was trying to give a little push back to see if you have engaged the complexity of the practice. I suppose that I could have just asked if you had but sometimes being negative produces deeper reflection:) I would be eager to read what you think are essential elements for STM to be DONE RIGHT. The second of the two papers that I mentioned above addresses some moral issues regarding Christian travel practices which includes STM. I wonder if you have addressed those issues in your practice of STM. Well, I look forward to dialoging with you more in the future.
Author: John Collins - June 30, 2010
All three of my children were a part of a summer missions trip that traveled to an foreign country. I each of my children this trip had a profound impact in their own spiritual development. They all came back with a greater passion to be used by God to share the gospel with others, a gratefulness to God for their salvation and upbringing that gave them the gospel early in life. I am so thankful for organizations that promote exposing young people to missions during the teen years.
Author: Aaron - June 30, 2010
The paper from Kurt Ver Beek was interesting because it contained SOME research, but MUCH speculation. He speculates that short-term missions may not engender any substantial positive effect on the people who go on short-term missions or on the people in mission settings who receive the STM participants. We do not know the nature of these trips he assessed, nor what his view on Scripture. We can sense a bit of frustration with the funding process. He may be concerned with money. It seems to me that people who tend towards focusing on money have a more shallow grasp on the scriptures. However, I do strongly agree with Nathan's comment that no matter what we do we are commanded to preach the Word, and let the Gospel do the work! It is the power of God unto Salvation. I can see, however, how it does seem that many youth groups take missions trips as another fun group event, instead of using it as a breeding and training ground for creating disciples as commanded in Matthew 28:19-20. We live in a culture that is tuned toward service. This too shall pass. Students today would rather help at the homeless shelter than play flag football at church. There is nothing right or wrong about that, but it will eventually be replaced by another cultural swing or shift. God's Word still stands and is just as effective as it was in the day it was written. I think we should, like Nathan said, continue to promote evangelism among those we influence, by whatever means we can.
Author: John - June 30, 2010
A couple years ago, my son went to Honduras on a short term trip. He was only 16, we were a little concerned letting him travel that far without us and that communication would be sparse. He couldn't speak Spanish but working thru translators shared the gospel. They worked in schools, orphanages, and on the streets. They mixed in some sight seeing and had some fun but kept focused on the cause at hand. Both your points proved true in the life of my son, you are bingo on the spot. Having seen what it did in the life of my son, it was one of the greatest decisions we made, he came back with his world rocked, his perspective changed and heart headed the right direction. He came back to his public school world, stood up, and made a difference. To offer up my thoughts on the ensuing dialog... I don't think it matters what we call it and I don't think we need to get too caught up on the nooks and crannies. Most people aren't doing it. There is a drought and we aren't even offering up water, who cares what brand of water we have. If some folks do too much looking and not enough ministry, but we see some change, then praise the Lord. The key right now is to hit the streets and get-r-done, we don't have the luxury of being picky.
Author: Matthew Melville` - June 30, 2010
Great dialogue! God is using STM or whatever you would desire to call it in a mighty way. We at WOL have tried to move our STM programs to "field driven" and not "participant driven". All of our trips are focused on the ministry that will benefit the church's & ministries in the respective countries. There are definitely challenges & discussions to have about STM and how it can be more effective, but I fully believe God is using it both to impact the participant & the nationals. May the Lord give us wisdom to maximize the impact for both...for HIS glory! Right now as we are debating the effectiveness, God is doing GREAT things through our participants. We have a trip in Trinidad & Honduras. More trips leaving in a few weeks to Honduras, Peru & El Salvador. May we judge the fruit by His standards, not ours! To God be the Glory!
Author: Luke Coburn - July 1, 2010
Nathan, you don't have to concede to any bias on the issue. The fact that you have experienced missions and been changed through the process does not indicate a bias...it indicates that you are living testament to the topic that you are addressing. If a cancer survivor gives me testimony of the difficulties of chemotherapy, I will take their word far more than someone who has merely read about the effects of chemo from a book. They have lived and experienced it. It has changed their life. The same is true for you. Your experience enhances your article because you can testify to the effects. God's Word trumps experience, but when the two do not conflict, experience enhances the discussion. Great post and conversation!
Author: Kelley - July 28, 2010
My biggest regret about my youth group days is not going on some of the trips to Mexico and Honduras. But I didn't really get into the "service" part until later. I missed out on a lot of growth early because I didn't go.
Author: Rick Warken - August 18, 2010
Is this dialogue still open for comment?
Author: Nathan Shoultz - August 18, 2010
yes definitely
Author: Rick Warken - December 19, 2011
Nathan, I have been looking through all of your messages and comments you have written that I am able to access to review your story because I led that trip you referred to in 96 to Peru. I can respond to the question from a practical point of view because of the other trips I have been able to accompany young people on as well. From my perspective one of the most important reasons for Short-term Missions is the effect that we see performed in us. We are changed when God uses us in a foreign country because we feel like we have been useful and successful when people come to Christ or believers are encouraged. It should be, in reality, an imposibility because we do not speak the language or understand the culture but when those barriers are minimized we work almost unhindered with the help of the Holy Spirit. The wake up call brings fruit because young people are now thankful for washers and dryers or hot showers or parks to play in that are clean and enough food on the table. Sure God gets us out of our comfort zone but we find ourselves sometimes thinking we have gone to the end of the world to reach that soul that is out there waiting for the Good News. So, the short-term is translated into long term because we feel a burden for those "back home" and understand their need of a Saviour. That is what keeps me young and active in overseas missions. We are commanded to, "Go ye into all the world and preach the gospel", Mk 16:15. Dude, I am committed to working this with you until the day of Christ. We will never never never throw in the towel. Lets rock our world for Christ.
Leave your comment
Name:

Your email:

Your website:

Message:

Please enter the code in the image below.

"I believe it is the responsibility of every generation to reach their generation for Christ" - Jack Wyrtzen